Hulasatu zariati t-taam

Name: Hulasatu zariati t-taam
Author: al-Antaki, Abd ar-Razzaq ibn Mustafa Husayn, Minla

İsim	Hulasatu zariati t-taam
Yazar	al-Antaki, Abd ar-Razzaq ibn Mustafa Husayn, Minla
Basım Tarihi:	1751
Tür	Kitap
Dil	Arapça
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Kütüphane:	Phaidra - Belgrad Üniversitesi
Kayıt Numarası	o-1719
Tarih	2012-04-03T09:27:30.916Z
Örnek Metin	In 617, the leaders of Makhzum and BanuAbd-Shams, two important Quraysh clans, declared a public boycott against Banu Hashim, their commercial rival, to pressure it into withdrawing its protection of Muhammad. The boycott lasted three years but eventually collapsed as it failed in its objective. During this, Muhammad was only able to preach during the holy pilgrimage months in which all hostilities between Arabs were suspended. The objections continued to be raised to the point where the rejection of the historicity of the incident eventually became the only acceptable orthodox Muslim position. Year of publishing: 1751.
Lisans	Ovo delo je licencirano pod uslovima licenceCreative Commons CC BY 2.0 AT - Creative Commons Autorstvo 2.0 Austria License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/at/legalcode

Kaynağa git Phaidra - Belgrad Üniversitesi Phaidra - Univerzitet u Beogradu

Aramaya Dön

Phaidra - Belgrad Üniversitesi

Kaynağa git

Hulasatu zariati t-taam

Yazar al-Antaki, Abd ar-Razzaq ibn Mustafa Husayn, Minla

Basım Tarihi 1751

Tür Kitap

Dil Arapça

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Kütüphane Phaidra - Belgrad Üniversitesi

Kayıt Numarası o-1719

Tarih 2012-04-03T09:27:30.916Z

Örnek Metin In 617, the leaders of Makhzum and BanuAbd-Shams, two important Quraysh clans, declared a public boycott against Banu Hashim, their commercial rival, to pressure it into withdrawing its protection of Muhammad. The boycott lasted three years but eventually collapsed as it failed in its objective. During this, Muhammad was only able to preach during the holy pilgrimage months in which all hostilities between Arabs were suspended. The objections continued to be raised to the point where the rejection of the historicity of the incident eventually became the only acceptable orthodox Muslim position. Year of publishing: 1751.

Lisans Ovo delo je licencirano pod uslovima licenceCreative Commons CC BY 2.0 AT - Creative Commons Autorstvo 2.0 Austria License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/at/legalcode