A Critical Review of the Book Religion and Theory of International Relations: Theory and Practice
(Bahram Navazeni)

Name: A Critical Review of the Book Religion and Theory of International Relations: Theory and Practice
Author: Bahram Navazeni

İsim	A Critical Review of the Book Religion and Theory of International Relations: Theory and Practice
İsim Orijinal	Bahram Navazeni
Yazar	Bahram Navazeni
Basım Yeri	Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) -
Konu	Islam, Religion
Tür	Kitap
Dil	Farsça
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Kütüphane:	Oxford İslami Araştırmalar Çevrimiçi
Demirbaş Numarası	EISSN: 2383-1650, DOI: 10.30465/crtls.2020.30180.1793
Kayıt Numarası	cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9d9d96d856a84022a7b5e02ff0f5f2bf
Lokasyon	DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Notlar	The book “Religion and Theory of International Relations: Theory and Practice” is a collection of articles compiled and translated into Persian by Asgar Ghahramanpour Bonab from scattered articles and journals by Daniel Filpat and several other researchers of international relations. By compiling these articles, the translator has attempted to address the important role of religion in shaping international relations in the Westphalian period and by evaluating its position among various mainstream and minor theories of international relations such as realism, liberalism, and constructivism, he has explored the function of different world religions such as Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Judaism, both in inciting civil strife and converging, and in uniting and strengthening the world peace. Given the importance of familiarity with different types of religions, as well as their historical role in the formation of societies and their developments, especially in the contemporary period, this article examines and evaluates this book and tries to recommend some formal as well as content revisions on translation, equivalence, and references. The authors of the articles, as well as the translator, seem to have neglected to observe the prevailing modern situation of the separation of religion from politics and the marginalized religion in contemporary international relations.
Bir Parçasıdır	پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی, 2020-11, Vol.20 (9), p.395-417

Kaynağa git Oxford İslami Araştırmalar Çevrimiçi Oxford Islamic Studies Online

Aramaya Dön

Oxford İslami Araştırmalar Çevrimiçi

Kaynağa git

A Critical Review of the Book Religion and Theory of International Relations: Theory and Practice

(Bahram Navazeni)

Yazar Bahram Navazeni

Basım Yeri Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) -

Konu Islam, Religion

Tür Kitap

Dil Farsça

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Kütüphane Oxford İslami Araştırmalar Çevrimiçi

Demirbaş Numarası EISSN: 2383-1650, DOI: 10.30465/crtls.2020.30180.1793

Kayıt Numarası cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9d9d96d856a84022a7b5e02ff0f5f2bf

Lokasyon DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals

Notlar The book “Religion and Theory of International Relations: Theory and Practice” is a collection of articles compiled and translated into Persian by Asgar Ghahramanpour Bonab from scattered articles and journals by Daniel Filpat and several other researchers of international relations. By compiling these articles, the translator has attempted to address the important role of religion in shaping international relations in the Westphalian period and by evaluating its position among various mainstream and minor theories of international relations such as realism, liberalism, and constructivism, he has explored the function of different world religions such as Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Judaism, both in inciting civil strife and converging, and in uniting and strengthening the world peace. Given the importance of familiarity with different types of religions, as well as their historical role in the formation of societies and their developments, especially in the contemporary period, this article examines and evaluates this book and tries to recommend some formal as well as content revisions on translation, equivalence, and references. The authors of the articles, as well as the translator, seem to have neglected to observe the prevailing modern situation of the separation of religion from politics and the marginalized religion in contemporary international relations.

Bir Parçasıdır پژوهش‌نامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی, 2020-11, Vol.20 (9), p.395-417