In the name of the Prince (igemonos) Crete Court of Appeal. Opponents: Ottoman Bank for Orphans acting on behalf of the Director İsmail Saratsaki, against Refat Ambti Agadaki, guardian of the out of law Housni Serdaraki or Hourhoudaki.

İsim	In the name of the Prince (igemonos) Crete Court of Appeal. Opponents: Ottoman Bank for Orphans acting on behalf of the Director İsmail Saratsaki, against Refat Ambti Agadaki, guardian of the out of law Housni Serdaraki or Hourhoudaki.
Basım Tarihi:	1902-11-09
Tür	Kitap
Dil	Modern Yunanca
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Fiziksel Boyutlar	20-30 cm
Kütüphane:	SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları
Demirbaş Numarası	ACCGVO00005
Kayıt Numarası	61299
Lokasyon	SALT Research
Tarih	1902-11-09
Notlar	Housni Serdarakis or Hourhoudakis had been characterized out of law from the Holy Court and the Ottoman Bank started to administer its properties. Among those properties there was a bill of exchange against Seitoulah Serdaraki or Hourhoudaki. The Bank supports that according to the law the foundation should receive a part of that money and thereafore the defendant still owes to the bank 3592 1/2 gr. both the Chania Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal rejected the case.

Kaynağa git SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları SALT Research Collections

Aramaya Dön

SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları

Kaynağa git

In the name of the Prince (igemonos) Crete Court of Appeal. Opponents: Ottoman Bank for Orphans acting on behalf of the Director İsmail Saratsaki, against Refat Ambti Agadaki, guardian of the out of law Housni Serdaraki or Hourhoudaki.

Basım Tarihi 1902-11-09

Tür Kitap

Dil Modern Yunanca

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Fiziksel Boyutlar 20-30 cm

Kütüphane SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları

Demirbaş Numarası ACCGVO00005

Kayıt Numarası 61299

Lokasyon SALT Research

Tarih 1902-11-09

Notlar Housni Serdarakis or Hourhoudakis had been characterized out of law from the Holy Court and the Ottoman Bank started to administer its properties. Among those properties there was a bill of exchange against Seitoulah Serdaraki or Hourhoudaki. The Bank supports that according to the law the foundation should receive a part of that money and thereafore the defendant still owes to the bank 3592 1/2 gr. both the Chania Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal rejected the case.