Propositions of Housein Boufaki, resident of Neas Horas Chania, against the Balizaki or Eminaki Family and Ali Azemaki, against the Appeal against him and the decision of the Chania Holy Court towards the Chania Holy Court. | Kütüphane.osmanlica.com

Propositions of Housein Boufaki, resident of Neas Horas Chania, against the Balizaki or Eminaki Family and Ali Azemaki, against the Appeal against him and the decision of the Chania Holy Court towards the Chania Holy Court.

İsim Propositions of Housein Boufaki, resident of Neas Horas Chania, against the Balizaki or Eminaki Family and Ali Azemaki, against the Appeal against him and the decision of the Chania Holy Court towards the Chania Holy Court.
Basım Tarihi: 1902-11-09
Tür Kitap
Dil Modern Yunanca
Dijital Evet
Yazma Hayır
Fiziksel Boyutlar 20-30 cm
Kütüphane: SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları
Demirbaş Numarası ACCEVS00189
Kayıt Numarası 54465
Lokasyon SALT Research
Tarih 1902-11-09
Notlar According to the decision no 147 of the Holy Court, the plaintiff had been recognized as heir of the late Haji Mourat Balizaki or Boufaki the opponents appealed. The plaintiff supports that he is the only heir of the late and that therefore the second defendant has to pay the rent to him and not to the firs defendants, as the Holy Court had already decided.
Kaynağa git SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları SALT Research Collections
SALT Research Collections SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları
Kaynağa git

Propositions of Housein Boufaki, resident of Neas Horas Chania, against the Balizaki or Eminaki Family and Ali Azemaki, against the Appeal against him and the decision of the Chania Holy Court towards the Chania Holy Court.

Basım Tarihi 1902-11-09
Tür Kitap
Dil Modern Yunanca
Dijital Evet
Yazma Hayır
Fiziksel Boyutlar 20-30 cm
Kütüphane SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları
Demirbaş Numarası ACCEVS00189
Kayıt Numarası 54465
Lokasyon SALT Research
Tarih 1902-11-09
Notlar According to the decision no 147 of the Holy Court, the plaintiff had been recognized as heir of the late Haji Mourat Balizaki or Boufaki the opponents appealed. The plaintiff supports that he is the only heir of the late and that therefore the second defendant has to pay the rent to him and not to the firs defendants, as the Holy Court had already decided.
SALT Research Collections
SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları yönlendiriliyorsunuz...

Lütfen bekleyiniz.