Chania Court of Appeal: Plaintiff: Hamides Ledopoulas, widow of Sakir Serailaki, 2)Halifes Serailaki, wife of Moustafa Kilerjaki 3) Selim Serailaki, represented by their Lawyer Nikolaou i. Pistolaki defendant: Administration of Muslim Foundations

İsim	Chania Court of Appeal: Plaintiff: Hamides Ledopoulas, widow of Sakir Serailaki, 2)Halifes Serailaki, wife of Moustafa Kilerjaki 3) Selim Serailaki, represented by their Lawyer Nikolaou i. Pistolaki defendant: Administration of Muslim Foundations
Basım Tarihi:	1908-03-06
Tür	Kitap
Dil	Modern Yunanca
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Fiziksel Boyutlar	20-30 cm
Kütüphane:	SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları
Demirbaş Numarası	ACCEVS00179
Kayıt Numarası	66211
Lokasyon	SALT Research
Tarih	1908-03-06
Notlar	Administration supported that in Tophana or Evraika Quarter there is a vakif residence the value of which is about 700 dr. and that had been offered by Tahiszade Baba Efendi, the Administration allowed to his heirs to stay there without paying the rent. However, Now the Administration needs the building but occupants refuse to abandon it occupants support that the residence is theirs the court of First Instance decided in favor of the Administration the Court of Appeal in favor of the occupants

Kaynağa git SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları SALT Research Collections

Aramaya Dön

SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları

Kaynağa git

Chania Court of Appeal: Plaintiff: Hamides Ledopoulas, widow of Sakir Serailaki, 2)Halifes Serailaki, wife of Moustafa Kilerjaki 3) Selim Serailaki, represented by their Lawyer Nikolaou i. Pistolaki defendant: Administration of Muslim Foundations

Basım Tarihi 1908-03-06

Tür Kitap

Dil Modern Yunanca

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Fiziksel Boyutlar 20-30 cm

Kütüphane SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları

Demirbaş Numarası ACCEVS00179

Kayıt Numarası 66211

Lokasyon SALT Research

Tarih 1908-03-06

Notlar Administration supported that in Tophana or Evraika Quarter there is a vakif residence the value of which is about 700 dr. and that had been offered by Tahiszade Baba Efendi, the Administration allowed to his heirs to stay there without paying the rent. However, Now the Administration needs the building but occupants refuse to abandon it occupants support that the residence is theirs the court of First Instance decided in favor of the Administration the Court of Appeal in favor of the occupants