Towards the Chania Holy Court, proposition by İsmail Hasan Moula Hasanaki, resident of Chania, against Hariyes of Ivraim Faratsaki, wife of İsmail Moula Hasanaki. The plaintiff supports that the suit against him by the defendant should be rejected. | Kütüphane.osmanlica.com

Towards the Chania Holy Court, proposition by İsmail Hasan Moula Hasanaki, resident of Chania, against Hariyes of Ivraim Faratsaki, wife of İsmail Moula Hasanaki. The plaintiff supports that the suit against him by the defendant should be rejected.

İsim Towards the Chania Holy Court, proposition by İsmail Hasan Moula Hasanaki, resident of Chania, against Hariyes of Ivraim Faratsaki, wife of İsmail Moula Hasanaki. The plaintiff supports that the suit against him by the defendant should be rejected.
Basım Tarihi: 1909-02-04
Tür Kitap
Dil Modern Yunanca
Dijital Evet
Yazma Hayır
Fiziksel Boyutlar 20-30 cm
Kütüphane: SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları
Demirbaş Numarası ACIEVFM00036
Kayıt Numarası 59836
Lokasyon SALT Research
Tarih 1909-02-04
Notlar Hariyes claims that he should pay her an allowance, because he was the responsible for their divorce. However, he supports that he invited her a lot of times to discuss, and that she left him without his permission she supports that she had to leave because of the illegal desires of her husband (paranomes epithimies).
Kaynağa git SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları SALT Research Collections
SALT Research Collections SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları
Kaynağa git

Towards the Chania Holy Court, proposition by İsmail Hasan Moula Hasanaki, resident of Chania, against Hariyes of Ivraim Faratsaki, wife of İsmail Moula Hasanaki. The plaintiff supports that the suit against him by the defendant should be rejected.

Basım Tarihi 1909-02-04
Tür Kitap
Dil Modern Yunanca
Dijital Evet
Yazma Hayır
Fiziksel Boyutlar 20-30 cm
Kütüphane SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları
Demirbaş Numarası ACIEVFM00036
Kayıt Numarası 59836
Lokasyon SALT Research
Tarih 1909-02-04
Notlar Hariyes claims that he should pay her an allowance, because he was the responsible for their divorce. However, he supports that he invited her a lot of times to discuss, and that she left him without his permission she supports that she had to leave because of the illegal desires of her husband (paranomes epithimies).
SALT Research Collections
SALT Araştırma Koleksiyonları yönlendiriliyorsunuz...

Lütfen bekleyiniz.