Integration | Kütüphane.osmanlica.com

Integration

İsim Integration
Yazar Şahin-Mencütek, Z., Gökalp-Aras, N. E., Kaya, A., Rottmann, Susan Beth
Basım Tarihi: 2023
Basım Yeri - Springer
Tür Kitap
Dil İngilizce
Dijital Evet
Yazma Hayır
Kütüphane: Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası 2364-4087
Kayıt Numarası 8a1f60de-7345-4316-8bed-8f881c5cef0e
Lokasyon Humanities and Social Sciences
Tarih 2023
Örnek Metin Strategic temporality permeates the integration experience of Turkey’s Syrians in a number of ways. First, given their temporary legal status, there is a grey area between reception and integration, which is highly symbolic of ambiguous inclusion (Kaya & Nagel, 2021). Until recently, there has been no publicly announced national integration policy; instead, there was only a discourse about uyum (social harmony) that is not premised on permanent inclusion or equal rights with locals. Further, refugees face liminality in every possible sphere governing long-term settlement, such as in the labour market, education, housing, health and citizenship. Most work informally and experience economic precarity; a third of Syrian children are not in school; refugees must secure their own (often substandard) housing; linguistic and other barriers prevent full health care access, and pathways to citizenship or long-term permanent residence are limited. All of this creates feelings of profound anxiety and uncertainty for refugees as they go about their day-to-day lives.
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-27366-7_5
Kaynağa git Özyeğin Üniversitesi Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Özyeğin Üniversitesi Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Kaynağa git

Integration

Yazar Şahin-Mencütek, Z., Gökalp-Aras, N. E., Kaya, A., Rottmann, Susan Beth
Basım Tarihi 2023
Basım Yeri - Springer
Tür Kitap
Dil İngilizce
Dijital Evet
Yazma Hayır
Kütüphane Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası 2364-4087
Kayıt Numarası 8a1f60de-7345-4316-8bed-8f881c5cef0e
Lokasyon Humanities and Social Sciences
Tarih 2023
Örnek Metin Strategic temporality permeates the integration experience of Turkey’s Syrians in a number of ways. First, given their temporary legal status, there is a grey area between reception and integration, which is highly symbolic of ambiguous inclusion (Kaya & Nagel, 2021). Until recently, there has been no publicly announced national integration policy; instead, there was only a discourse about uyum (social harmony) that is not premised on permanent inclusion or equal rights with locals. Further, refugees face liminality in every possible sphere governing long-term settlement, such as in the labour market, education, housing, health and citizenship. Most work informally and experience economic precarity; a third of Syrian children are not in school; refugees must secure their own (often substandard) housing; linguistic and other barriers prevent full health care access, and pathways to citizenship or long-term permanent residence are limited. All of this creates feelings of profound anxiety and uncertainty for refugees as they go about their day-to-day lives.
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-27366-7_5
Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Özyeğin Üniversitesi yönlendiriliyorsunuz...

Lütfen bekleyiniz.