Conclusion

Name: Conclusion
Author: Şahin-Mencütek, Z., Gökalp-Aras, N. E., Kaya, A., Rottmann, Susan Beth

İsim	Conclusion
Yazar	Şahin-Mencütek, Z., Gökalp-Aras, N. E., Kaya, A., Rottmann, Susan Beth
Basım Tarihi:	2023
Basım Yeri	- Springer
Tür	Kitap
Dil	İngilizce
Dijital	Evet
Yazma	Hayır
Kütüphane:	Özyeğin Üniversitesi
Demirbaş Numarası	2-s2.0-85151255881
Kayıt Numarası	3c32bf29-811a-48e8-bd9d-728225179a59
Lokasyon	Humanities and Social Sciences
Tarih	2023
Örnek Metin	The findings of this in-depth case study provide insights for generalisations about how strategic temporality may operate in other refugee-hosting countries as well as specific findings about state responses to mass migration situations. Some key findings can be summarised as including a (1) complicated and fragmented legal system, (2) multiplicity of actors, (3) re-nationalisation and restrictiveness, (4) increased complexity and uncertainty in all layers of rules and practices, (5) consistent liminality experienced by refugees. These characteristics are observable in concrete policy practices in diverse sub-policy fields involving remote border controls, blocking reception, downgrading protection and slowing integration. As we showed, the concept of strategic temporality, along with its related components of liminality, uncertainty and complexity, is helpful for understanding state responses across time and sub-policy fields.
DOI	10.1007/978-3-031-27366-7_6

Kaynağa git Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Aramaya Dön

Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Kaynağa git

Conclusion

Yazar Şahin-Mencütek, Z., Gökalp-Aras, N. E., Kaya, A., Rottmann, Susan Beth

Basım Tarihi 2023

Basım Yeri - Springer

Tür Kitap

Dil İngilizce

Dijital Evet

Yazma Hayır

Kütüphane Özyeğin Üniversitesi

Demirbaş Numarası 2-s2.0-85151255881

Kayıt Numarası 3c32bf29-811a-48e8-bd9d-728225179a59

Lokasyon Humanities and Social Sciences

Tarih 2023

Örnek Metin The findings of this in-depth case study provide insights for generalisations about how strategic temporality may operate in other refugee-hosting countries as well as specific findings about state responses to mass migration situations. Some key findings can be summarised as including a (1) complicated and fragmented legal system, (2) multiplicity of actors, (3) re-nationalisation and restrictiveness, (4) increased complexity and uncertainty in all layers of rules and practices, (5) consistent liminality experienced by refugees. These characteristics are observable in concrete policy practices in diverse sub-policy fields involving remote border controls, blocking reception, downgrading protection and slowing integration. As we showed, the concept of strategic temporality, along with its related components of liminality, uncertainty and complexity, is helpful for understanding state responses across time and sub-policy fields.

DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-27366-7_6