Gazzâlî ve İbn Haldun'un görüşlerinde bilgiyi etkileyen sosyal faktörlerin işlevinin karşılaştırmalı analizi

İsim Gazzâlî ve İbn Haldun'un görüşlerinde bilgiyi etkileyen sosyal faktörlerin işlevinin karşılaştırmalı analizi
Yazar Kargalar ona ihanet etti
Basım Yeri Hawzah ve Üniversitesi Araştırma Enstitüsü -
Konu asabyyat, ekonomik faktörler, bilgi, felsefi bilgi, dini faktör, sosyal faktörler
Tür Belge
Dil Belirlenmemiş dil
Dijital Evet
Yazma Hayır
Kütüphane: Belfast Kraliçe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Demirbaş Numarası ISSN: 2322-2506, EISSN: 2588-4700
Kayıt Numarası cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_77a42aeff25b4905aadc18645c2507fc
Açıklama The aim of this research is to infer the role of social factors in the creation of human knowledge in Al-Ghazālī (c.1056–1111) and Ibn-Khaldun's (c.1332–1406) views with a comparative approach. The method of this research is comparative analysis of Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's understandings of this phenomenon through reviewing and scrutinizing their views. Findings of this study show that the relationship between knowledge and society is one of the main concerns of these two Muslim philosophers. They both have tried to investigate how social factors influence various levels of human knowledge. In the view of Ibn-Khaldun, the division of people into rural population and urban population is based on a variety of social factors. But from the viewpoint of Al-Ghazali, the division of human beings into common people, theologians and mystics refers to their knowledge system which can be influenced by social factors. Results demonstrate that while Al-Ghazali notices the role of social factors as barriers to the realization of genuine knowledge, he determines their function in the formation of human knowledge such as jurisprudence, theology and politics. Ghazali in his approach mainly attempts to display negative aspects of social factors of knowledge formation and development. On the contrary, Ibn-Khaldun tries to explore the diversity of social factors such as Asabyyat (mostly known as tribal solidarity), geographical situation, economy, religion and environment with a realistic approach using an objective experience. He expresses both positive and negative roles and endeavors to show their impact just in the form of knowledge and not its content.
Şuna bir parçasıdır Islām va ʻulūm-i ijtimāʻī (Online), 1394-06, Vol.7 (13), p.139-165
Kaynak DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Kaynağa git Belfast Kraliçe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri Belfast Kraliçe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri - Osmanlıca el yazması arama motoru
Belfast Kraliçe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri - Osmanlıca el yazması arama motoru Belfast Kraliçe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri

Gazzâlî ve İbn Haldun'un görüşlerinde bilgiyi etkileyen sosyal faktörlerin işlevinin karşılaştırmalı analizi

Yazar Kargalar ona ihanet etti
Basım Yeri Hawzah ve Üniversitesi Araştırma Enstitüsü -
Konu asabyyat, ekonomik faktörler, bilgi, felsefi bilgi, dini faktör, sosyal faktörler
Tür Belge
Dil Belirlenmemiş dil
Dijital Evet
Yazma Hayır
Kütüphane Belfast Kraliçe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri
Demirbaş Numarası ISSN: 2322-2506, EISSN: 2588-4700
Kayıt Numarası cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_77a42aeff25b4905aadc18645c2507fc
Açıklama The aim of this research is to infer the role of social factors in the creation of human knowledge in Al-Ghazālī (c.1056–1111) and Ibn-Khaldun's (c.1332–1406) views with a comparative approach. The method of this research is comparative analysis of Al-Ghazālī and Ibn-Khaldun's understandings of this phenomenon through reviewing and scrutinizing their views. Findings of this study show that the relationship between knowledge and society is one of the main concerns of these two Muslim philosophers. They both have tried to investigate how social factors influence various levels of human knowledge. In the view of Ibn-Khaldun, the division of people into rural population and urban population is based on a variety of social factors. But from the viewpoint of Al-Ghazali, the division of human beings into common people, theologians and mystics refers to their knowledge system which can be influenced by social factors. Results demonstrate that while Al-Ghazali notices the role of social factors as barriers to the realization of genuine knowledge, he determines their function in the formation of human knowledge such as jurisprudence, theology and politics. Ghazali in his approach mainly attempts to display negative aspects of social factors of knowledge formation and development. On the contrary, Ibn-Khaldun tries to explore the diversity of social factors such as Asabyyat (mostly known as tribal solidarity), geographical situation, economy, religion and environment with a realistic approach using an objective experience. He expresses both positive and negative roles and endeavors to show their impact just in the form of knowledge and not its content.
Şuna bir parçasıdır Islām va ʻulūm-i ijtimāʻī (Online), 1394-06, Vol.7 (13), p.139-165
Kaynak DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Belfast Kraliçe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri - Osmanlıca el yazması arama motoru
Belfast Kraliçe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri yönlendiriliyorsunuz...

Lütfen bekleyiniz.